AT WAR INSIDE THE MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE

REPOST FROM 4/4/10
********************************
AT WAR INSIDE THE MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE CASE

ORDER IN THE COURTS:
THE MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE IS NOW IN SESSION

FROM SEEING WHAT TOOK PLACE AT AIRPORT COURT
THE REAL STORY LIES DOWNTOWN INSIDE THE
MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE PROBATE CASE

THE ESTATE IS AT WAR

THE ONLY ONE THAT CAN GO UP AGAINST THE
ESTATE SEEMS TO BE JOE JACKSON KATERINE'S
BACK IS UP AGAINST THE WALL HARD
JOE JACKSON FIGHTS FOR THE EVIDENCE TO BE
SEEN AND FOR THE TRUTH TO BE MADE KNOWN

THE JUDGE MUST SEE THE EVIDENCE!!!
THE EVIDENCE IS OVERWHELMING.

THE ESTATE IS BATTLING WITH THE ADMINISTRATORS
OF THE ESTATE . FOR THOSE WHO ARE UNCLEAR
WHO THE ADMINISTRATORS ARE :

THEY ARE BRANCA/McCLAIN
WEITZMAN REPRESENTS THEM BOTH,
SO IN A NUTSHELL IT'S BRANCA/WEITZMAN

WHILE MURRAY WAS ARRAIGNED AT AIRPORT
COURTS EVERYONES ATTENTION WAS THERE:
MEANWHILE DOWNTOWN THE ESTATE WAS IN SESSION
BATTLING BRANCA/WEITZMAN

NOTE: THESE EXHIBITS BELOW ARE PART OF THE
EVIDENCE THAT THE JUDGE MUST SEE

EXHIBIT A: LETTER FROM MJ TO JOHN BRANCA FIRING HIM
EXHIBIT B: INTERFOR REPORT IE: OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS
MOTTOLLA/BRANCA CONNECTIONS

******************************************************
UPDATE IN THE MICHAEL JOSEPH JACKSON
PROBATE CASE SUMMARY
Los Angeles Superior Court
- ProbateCase Summary

Case Number: BP117321
JACKSON, MICHAEL JOSEPH - DECEDENT

Filing Date: 06/29/2009
Case Type: Letters of Administration
(General Jurisdiction)
Status: Judgment by Court-Petition
denied 11/17/2009
--------------------------------------------
Future Hearings

02/09/2010 Miscellaneous-Other (THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL
JACKSON'S OBJECTIONS TO JOSEPH JACKSON'S REQUEST FOR
JUDICIAL NOTICE OF CATOURAS V. DEPT. OF THE CHP )
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner

02/04/2010 Objection Document
(THE ESTATE'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTION TO AND ETC. )
Filed by Petitioner

02/04/2010 Reply/Response
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner

02/03/2010 Order - Other
(ORDER AUTHORIZING SPECIAL ADMINISTRATORS TO
CONTINUE OPERATION, ETC. )
Filed by Attorney for Petitioner


“Michael Jackson Terminated Branca as his Attorney
on February 3, 2003. Michael Jackson terminated
John Branca as his attorney on February 3, 2003,
in a written termination letter. (Exhibit “A”).
Michael Jackson instructed Branca in writing to
resign from all positions he had in Michael
Jackson’s personal and business life . Branca
failed to follow Michael Ja ckson’s instructions,
but still remains obligated to comply with those
instructions and resign as Executor.

“On February 3, 2003, Michael Jackson instructed Branca
to turn over to his new attorneys all records, files,
and papers dealing with his personal and business life.
While Branca turned over his other files, Branca secretly
refused to turn over the purported July 7, 2002, Will,
and March 2002, Trust. In violation of his fiduciary duties,
Branca concealed the Will and concealed his refusal to
resign as Executor. Branca’s concealment of the Will and
failure to resign continued for many years despite Michael
Jackson’s numerous demands Branca turn over all documents
and resign from all positions. Branca’s conduct is an ethical
violation this Court should not permit.

“Michael Jackson Terminated John Branca because of Embezzlement.
In 2003, Michael Jackson launched an investigation into Branca’s
embezzlement activities regarding Michel Jackson’s money.

The investigators, the firm of Interfor in New York,
reported in February, March, and with a final report on
April 15, 2003, there was an improper relationship between
Tommy Mattola and John Branca whereby Branca and Matolla
were illegally funneling Michael Jackson’s money to off-shore
accounts in the Caribbean. (Exhibit “B”).

The Interfor Report caused Michael Jackson great anger,
and Michael Jackson demanded Branca never have anything
to do with him, his business, his family, or his personal
life again. Michael Jackson terminated John Branca because
of his belief that Branca had committed crimes against him.
Branca never accounted to Michael Jackson regarding his conduct,
nor disclosed his books and records to Michael Jackson.

“Whether it was true or false that Branca had embezzled money
[from] Michael Jackson, Michael Jackson’s belief that it
occurred was the basis for Branca’s termination, and Branca
never complied with Michael Jackson’s demands he account
and resign.

A conflicts [sic] of interest exists between John Branca
and the Estate of Michael Jackson. It would be grossly
negligent for any Executor of the Estate of Michael
Jackson to ignore the investigator’s report concerning
Branca.

However, Branca has undertaken no investigation of his
own financial transactions with Michael Jackson,
nor will he do so because of his conflicts of interest.
He has willfully concealed from this Court the reasons
for his termination, and he has willfully concealed form
the Court Michael Jackson’s belief that Branca’s
embezzled money….

“Michael Jackson was not in Los Angeles on July 7, 2002.
On July 7, 2002, Michael Jackson was in New York City,
and he was not in Los Angeles at 5:00 p.m. to sign the
purported Will as the Will recites. Branca and McClain
have concealed form this Court the material fact that
Michael Jackson did not sign the purported July 7, 2002,
Will as they have claimed repeatedly under penalty of perjury.

Their concealment of this information [from] the Court
is a fraud on the Court and disqualifies them form being
Executors of the Estate […] McClain had a duty to inform
the Court Michael Jackson was not in Los Angeles on
July 7, 2002.

They concealed that fact from this Court.

Branca and McClain have violated their fiduciary
duties by testifying under penalty of perjury
on at least seventeen (17) times the purported
July 7, 2002, Will was correct.”

Judge Beckloff threw this entire document out,
along with all the compelling evidence as to
its veracity.

He didn’t consider it at all;
apparently not even giving it a second thought.

COPY OF THE WILL
http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/0701_mj_will_wm.pdf

By Dr. Firpo Carr
Los Angeles Sentinel Newspaper
November 12 - 18, 2009
Article / Column
http://firpocarr.com/id5.html

DR. CARR SAYS IT SO CLEAR
Judge Beckloff threw this entire document out,
along with all the compelling evidence as to its veracity.

MJHOAXLIVE: CONNECTING THE DOTS: THE WILL, JOHN BRANCA AND MOTTOLA