Wednesday, February 17, 2010

THE MAN THAT WOULD BETRAY MICHAEL JACKSON

MICHAEL JACKSON FIRED JOHN BRANCA
HE WAS NEVER REHIRED.

HERE IS A COPY OF THE LETTER
TO MR. JOHN BRANCA

Branca and McClain were grossly negligent in their
statements to the court. They have concealed material
information from the court. They have conducted themselves
in a fraudulent deceptive manner where their veracity can
no longer be trusted.

Furthermore Michael Jackson terminated John Branca in writing
as his attorney on February 3 2003 (Exhibit B)
He instructed Branca to resign from all positions in his personal
and business life.

However, unknown to Michael Jackson, Branca failed to follow
his instructions regarding any purported will.
Nevertheless, Branca remains obligated to comply with those
instructions and resign as Executor.

On February 3, 2003 Michael Jackson instructed Branca to turn
over to his new attorneys all records, files and papers dealing
with the personal and Business life. While Branca turned over
his other files Branca secretly refused to turn over the purported
July 7. 2002 Will and March 2002 Trust.

In violation of his fiduciary duties, Branca concealed the purported
will and concealed his refusal to resign. Branca's secret concealment
of the purported Will and failure to resign continued for six (6) years
despite Michael Jackson numerous demands Branca turn over all
documents and resign from all positions.

It wasn't until July 1, 2009, that Branca produced the previously
concealed Will which he had intentionally concealed for six (6) years.
The courts should not permit this unethical violation.

Michael Jackson Terminated Branca because of Embezzlement.
In 2003, Michael Jackson launched an investigation into Branca
embezzlement activities regarding Michael Jacksons money.

The investigators, the firm of INTERFOR in New York, reported
in February , March with a final report on April 15, 2003 there
was an improper relationship between Sony Executive Tommy
Mottola and John Branca whereby Branca and Motolla were
illegally funneling Michael Jackson's money to off shore accounts
in the Caribbean. (Exhibit C)

INTERFOR REPORT: The Interfor Report caused Michael
Jackson great anger and Michael Jackson demanded Branca
never have anything to do with him his business his family
or his personal life again.

6 comments:

  1. Do you have PROOF mj didn't rehire him again?? Or are we again to believe it because it's in print?? Do you even have it in print this interfor report?? Not trying to be offensive or something ,but is Oxman now suddenly the "bible"on all things MJ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. soo if its not hoax related then its bs....that´s why i no longer log on to the hoax sites...why fans or i must call them believers fall for the illuminati, new order or mind control thing??? but when yuo present them something that can actually be true they tend to ignore or bash them???what´s up with that double standard....
    since the beginning i had my suspicions regarding thome, dileo and branca...oh and aeg and everybody surrounding MJ....he was their gold mine and yeah the jackson´s are an unconventional family but at the end of the day they are MJ´s family and they love him more than anyone would so i applaud your determination to open our eyes...what if they are the ones that started the hoax thing??? what if they are the ones giving out "clues"??? this has to stop.....

    ReplyDelete
  3. For some reason I feel like believing that Michael rehired Branca. Actually I keep thinking how Michael sad he "outsmarted" Sony. This was also at the time Branca was thrown out from MJ' circle. I keep thinking that they were "together"in this. Ya, know Branca playing "dirty" but he'll be exposed and then "sadly" he contracts are illegitimate and thus Michael will get everything. I could be wrong but that's what I feel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How do you know Branca did not hand over the deeds to the trust and will for seven years. This would be great if their was proof of this and make more sense really. Is there any article that could prove this somewhere do you know?.

    ReplyDelete
  5. THE EXHIBITS ARE PART OF THE EVIDENSE THAT OXMAN IS TAKING IN MAY 26th FOR THE EVIDENTIARY HEARING

    THE ADMINISTRATORS "OF THE ESTATE ARE TRYING TO QUASH THAT EVIDENSE FROM COMING IN...
    I AM FOLLOWING THIS CASE VERY CLOSELY AND
    HAVE BEEN ATTENDING MOST ALL OF THE COURT PROCEEDINGS..

    THE EVIDENSE IS CRUCIAL TO THIS CASE ...,
    THE EVIDENSE IS OVERWHELMING

    T DID GET A COPY OF OXMANS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT OF WHICH I CAN NOT DISCLOSE. THE CASE HAS NOT GONE TO TRIAL I WILL NOT RELEASE ANY MORE INFO THE LETTER IS ENOUGH...

    THE INTERFOR REPORT IS AS WELL PART OF THAT EVIDENSE

    PLEASE READ AS MUCH AS YOU CAN ON THE INFORMATION I HAVE PUT OUT THERE.

    I THINK IT MIGHT HELP THOSE OF YOU THAT DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING DOWN INSIDE THE MICHAEL JACKSON ESTATE.

    IT'S DELIBERATE IT'S REAL..
    TIME IS RUNNING OUT THE CLOCK IS TICKING

    TWIGGY

    ReplyDelete
  6. HMMMMM...Sad that you cherry picked what information or "evidence" you want to put on your blog.

    1) Branca was fired because of false information..it came out in OPEN COURT that Le grande had no proof of what he was accusing Branca of doing (mainly conspiring with Sony to steal money from MJ). If you took a minute to READ to court transcript, you would have the accurate information.
    2) MJ rehired John Branca after 2003.
    3) Branca RESIGNED in 2006, because of all the crazies that surrounded MJ at that time, mainly Thome Thome and the Nation of Islam.

    So if you want to gain some credibility, be forthcoming and post ALL that is known. YOu can't claimed not to know all this, since you took the time to post the 2003 letter, I am sure if you google a minute longer, you would have found the court transcript where Le Grange HIMSELF testified urn oath that he FOUND no proof of what he suspected Branca of doing. He did have his suspicions, but after investigation he HIMSELF admitted that his suspicions might have been unfounded.

    ReplyDelete