THE WILL AND JOHN BRANCA (2)

According to the will, it was signed on
July 7, 2002 at 5:00 PM in Los Angeles.
AND NO IT WASN'T NOTARIZED.
The two witnesses are the executors.

Today in case any of you missed it;
Randy Jackson told TMZ he has proof
MJ was in New York from July 5 through July 9
on a campaign against Sony honcho Tommy Mottola,
claiming Mottola had a thing against Black artists.

The lawyer for the estate, Howard Weitzman,
tells TMZ the witnesses to the will were face-to-face
with Jackson when he signed the document.
Weitzman would not say if the will was signed
in L.A., even though the document refers to Los Angeles.

Read more on what unfolded today:
http://www.tmz.com/category/michael-jackson/#ixzz0UdTLSeC6

BUT IS THAT REALLY WHATS GOING ON HERE?
Is there a conflict of interest?
Is the will even valid? Was the will forged?
Was it signed under duress?
With Branca and McClain being the only
witness', outside of Trusdy Green and
 now running the Estate?
How can we know for sure what really
happened that day?

According to a signed document presented
by Barry Seigel, CPA he resigned of
his duties, Aug 26,2003. This leaves
Branca and McClain. and (Trudy Green)

Howard Weitzman represents Branca/McClain.
There's one important factor here that
I think they (TMZ) missed and that was the
resignation of Barry Seigel, CPA. Was
the will signed at his office in LA?
Why did he resign? What does he know?
Seigel resigned as co-Trustee of
The Michael Jackson Family Trust and
as Co-Executor of the last will of
Michael Jackson , 8/26/03.

WHAT MADE BARRY SEIGEL,CPA
RESIGN AND WALK AWAY?
AS THE STORY CONTINUES TO UNFOLD

NOTE: THE WILL AND JOHN BRANCA(PROBATE)
POSTED OCTOBER 1, 2009

WAS THE WILL FORGED?? WAS IT SIGNED UNDER DURESS.
IS THE WILL EVEN VALID? WATCH THE VIDEO BELOW.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kvu301ATe_0